Martin Damm vs Giles Hussey Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 12:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Damm vs G. Hussey

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Damm 0 - 1 Hussey
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin Damm winning 0 and Giles Hussey winning 2. The last match between Giles Hussey and Martin Damm was at the Chicago Challenger, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Giles Hussey getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Damm | 0 |
| Hussey | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chicago Challenger(08-05-25)
M. Damm vs G. Hussey H2H Profile
M. Damm vs G. Hussey Match Preview:
- When examining recent second serve performance, Damm wins 47.49% of points, compared to Hussey's 47.57%. How significant is this difference? It's marginal and suggests they are closely matched in this area.
- Considering return game stats, Damm claims 46.76% of points on opponents' second serves, outperforming Hussey's 43.84%. This edge could be crucial for match success.
- On the flip side, Hussey excels in first serve returns with a rate of 28.4%, surpassing Damm's 20.73% effectiveness. Could this advantage tilt the match in Hussey's favor?
- Under pressure, Damm saves 58.85% of breakpoints, a slight advantage over Hussey's 54.91%. This indicates a mental edge in high-stress situations.
- From a year-long perspective, Damm has a 66% win rate, slightly better than Hussey's 62.3%. Will this overall success rate prove decisive?
- Both players prefer hard courts as their optimal surface, where Damm has a 65% win rate while Hussey boasts 67%. Hussey's slight edge may influence the match outcome on hard surfaces.
- Level of play differs recently; Damm plays primarily in lower-tier tournaments with an 81.25% win rate, while Hussey competes in higher-level events with a 62.5% win rate. Does playing against tougher competition give Hussey an edge?
- In terms of opponent quality over the past year, Damm has faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 389.4, compared to Hussey’s 400.62.
- For deciding set performance, Hussey shows resilience, winning 50% of deciding sets, outmatching Damm’s 35%. Will this influence the match if it goes the distance?
- Despite the marginal difference in break point conversion, with Damm at 29.27% and Hussey at 32.61%, Hussey's efficiency could provide crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
In the upcoming match, both players showcase strengths and closely matched stats, particularly in second serve performance. However, Hussey's better first serve return and breakpoint conversion rates suggest an edge over Damm in crucial match situations.
Damm has shown a stronger ability to save breakpoints under pressure, yet Hussey’s consistent performance against slightly less ranked opponents along with higher tournament experience could be decisive.
Considering their respective strengths and current form, Hussey appears more likely to harness small advantages effectively, leading to a potential victory in this encounter.
Martin Damm vs Giles Hussey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Damm vs G. Hussey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 14 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:0:13 | Average Match Time | 2:0:13 |
| 69% (52/75) | 1st Serve % | 61% (55/90) |
| 69% (36/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (36/55) |
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (21/35) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 37% (33/90) | Return Points Win % | 40% (30/75) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Damm Recent Matches Played
G. Hussey Recent Matches Played

M. Damm vs G. Hussey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.12% (188/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.97% (199/117) |
| 57.93% (431/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.89% (439/294) |
| 52.50% (3943/3568) | Games Win/Loss | 53.69% (3728/3216) |
| 64.10% (100/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.50% (133/67) |
| 49.41% (42/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.71% (23/12) |
| 59.74% (46/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.67% (37/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 28.57% (6/15) |
| 0.84 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3069 | Aces Total | 877 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1222 | Total Double Faults | 743 |
| 1:41:53 | Average Match Time | 1:35:48 |
| 432.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.95 |
| 59% (13421/22581) | 1st Serve % | 62% (12023/19247) |
| 76% (10241/13421) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8085/12023) |
| 50% (4576/9160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3674/7224) |
| 39% (712/1826) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (908/2077) |
| 36% (7955/22241) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8064/19545) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 52.03% (64/59) | Challenger W/L | 52.24% (35/32) |
| 65.91% (116/60) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (162/81) |
| 59% (182/309) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (194/310) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 54% (88/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (46/91) |
| 47% (52/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (57/99) |
| 80% (201/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (194/164) |
| 20% (201/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (194/30) |
| 21% (117/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (122/35) |